翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Prosimuliini
・ Prosiměřice
・ Prosinko
・ Prosecco
・ Prosecco (Trieste)
・ Prosechen Island
・ Prosecretin
・ Prosection
・ Prosector
・ Prosector's wart
・ Prosecuting Attorney of Honolulu
・ Prosecuting Casey Anthony
・ Prosecution (film)
・ Prosecution association
・ Prosecution disclaimer
Prosecution history estoppel
・ Prosecution of gender-targeted crimes
・ Prosecution of Marte Dalelv
・ Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
・ Prosecution of Rodricus Crawford
・ Prosecution Service of Russia class rate insignia
・ Prosecutions Division (Hong Kong)
・ Prosecutive case
・ Prosecutor
・ Prosecutor General of Brazil
・ Prosecutor General of Finland
・ Prosecutor General of Puerto Rico
・ Prosecutor General of Russia
・ Prosecutor General of the Republic of Crimea
・ Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Prosecution history estoppel : ウィキペディア英語版
Prosecution history estoppel
Prosecution history estoppel, also known as file-wrapper estoppel, is a term used to indicate that a person who has filed a patent application, and then makes narrowing amendments to the application to accommodate the patent law, may be precluded from invoking the doctrine of equivalents to broaden the scope of their claims to cover subject matter ceded by the amendments. Although primarily a U.S. term, questions of whether, or the extent to which the prosecution history should be relevant for determining the extent of protection of a patent also arise outside the U.S.
== Canada ==
(詳細はpurposive construction, which relies on reading both the claims and the specifications to determine the scope of a patent, and extrinsic evidence is not permitted. Therefore, the Canadian courts emphatically reject what they refer to as "file wrapper estoppel".〔''Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. Beatty Bros. Ltd.'' (1962) 23 Fox Pat. C. 112 (Ex. Ct.), and ''P.L.G. Research Ltd. v. Jannock Steel Fabricating Co.'', (1991) 35 C.P.R. (3d) 346 (F.C.T.D.), noted in 〕 No distinction is drawn between cases involving allegations of literal infringement and those involving substantive infringement, which means that the negotiations that have taken place between the patentee and the Patent Office cannot be used in order to establish a particular equivalent. Similarly, a patentee is barred from using any previous negotiations with the Patent Office in order to determine the scope of the claims of the patent (i.e. the negotiations cannot be used by the patentee or against the patentee in determining the scope of the claims within the patent).
This is one of the significant differences that exist between Canadian and US patent jurisprudence, which leads some legal commentators to state that Canada is more friendly for rights holders in pursuing patent claims.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Prosecution history estoppel」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.